Protecting Rights, Saving Lives. Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people in 90 countries worldwide, spotlighting abuses and bringing perpetrators to justice Dec 05, · The puzzle is how to reconcile this with the many examples of blatant human rights violations. Saudi Arabia ratified the treaty banning discrimination against women in , and yet by law May 10, · How are human rights represented in the philosophy of Enlightenment? Analyze human rights violations in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Original Human Rights Topics for Essays. How is the issue of human rights developed in the movie “Hidden Figures”? Define the term “ombudsman.” What role does it play in the issue of human rights?
Women’s Human Rights – International Justice Resource Center
I n JulyAmarildo de Souza, a bricklayer living in a Rio de Janeiro favela, was arrested by police in an operation to round up drug traffickers. He was never seen again. Brazil, one of the largest democracies in the world, human rights violations essay, is rarely considered to be among the major human rights-violating countries.
But every year more than a thousand killings by police — very likely summary executions, according to Human Rights Watch — take human rights violations essay in Rio de Janeiro alone. The prohibition of extrajudicial killings is central to human rights law, and it is a rule that Brazil flagrantly violates — not as a matter of official policy, but as a matter of practice.
These countries all have judicial systems, and most suspected criminals are formally charged and appear in court. But the courts are slow and underfunded, so police, under pressure to combat crime, employ extrajudicial methods, such as torture, to extract confessions. Yet it seems that the human rights agenda has fallen on hard times. In much of the Islamic world, women lack equality, religious dissenters are persecuted and political freedoms are curtailed.
The Chinese model of development, which combines political repression and economic liberalism, human rights violations essay, has attracted numerous admirers in the developing world. Political authoritarianism has gained ground in Russia, human rights violations essay, Turkey, Hungary and Venezuela.
Backlashes against LGBT rights have taken place in countries as diverse as Russia and Nigeria. The traditional champions of human rights — Europe and the United States — have floundered. Europe has turned inward as it has struggled with a sovereign debt crisis, xenophobia towards its Muslim communities and disillusionment with Brussels.
Even age-old scourges such as slavery continue to exist. A recent report estimates that nearly 30 million people are forced against their will to work. At a time when human rights violations remain widespread, the discourse of human rights continues to flourish.
Although people have always criticised governments, it is only in recent decades that human rights violations essay have begun to do so in the distinctive idiom of human rights.
The United States and Europe have recently condemned human rights violations essay rights violations in Syria, Russia, human rights violations essay, China and Iran. Western countries often make foreign aid conditional on human rights and have even launched military interventions based on human rights violations. Many people argue that the incorporation of the idea of human rights into international law is one of the great moral achievements of human history. Thus, international human rights law provides people with invaluable protections against the power of the state.
And yet it is hard to avoid the conclusion that governments continue to violate human rights with impunity. Why, for example, human rights violations essay, do more than countries out human rights violations essay countries human rights violations essay belong to the UN engage in torture?
Why has the number of authoritarian countries increased in the last several years? Why do women remain a subordinate class in nearly all countries of the world? Why do human rights violations essay continue to work in mines and factories in so many countries? The truth is that human rights law has failed to accomplish its objectives.
There is little evidence that human rights treaties, on the whole, human rights violations essay, have improved the wellbeing of people. The reason is that human rights were never as universal as people hoped, human rights violations essay, and the belief that they could be forced upon countries as a matter of international law was shot through with human rights violations essay assumptions from the very beginning.
The human rights movement shares something in common with the hubris of development economics, which in previous decades tried and failed to alleviate poverty by imposing top-down solutions on developing countries. But where development economists have reformed their approach, the human rights movement has yet to acknowledge its failures.
It is time for a reckoning. Although the modern notion of human rights emerged during the 18th century, it was on December 10,that the story began in earnest, with the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the UN general assembly. The declaration arose from the ashes of the second world war and aimed to launch a new, brighter era of international relations. The weaknesses that would go on to undermine human rights law were there from the start.
The universal declaration was not a treaty in the formal sense: no one at the time believed that it created legally binding obligations.
It was not ratified by nations but approved by the general assembly, and the UN charter did not give the general assembly the power to make international law. Moreover, the rights were described in vague, aspirational terms, which could be interpreted in multiple ways, and national governments — even the liberal democracies — were wary of binding legal obligations. The US did not commit itself to eliminating racial segregation, and Britain and France did not commit themselves to liberating the subject populations in their colonies.
Several authoritarian states — including the Soviet Union, human rights violations essay, Yugoslavia and Saudi Arabia — refused to vote in favour of the universal declaration and instead abstained. The words in the universal declaration may have been stirring, but no one believed at the time that they portended a major change in the way international relations would be conducted; nor did they capture the imagination of voters, politicians, intellectuals or anyone else who might have exerted political pressure on governments.
Part of the problem was that a disagreement opened up early on between human rights violations essay US and the Soviet Union. These rights were, human rights violations essay, not coincidentally, the rights set out in the US constitution. The Soviets argued that human rights consisted of social or economic rights — the rights to work, to healthcare, and to education, human rights violations essay. As was so often the case during the cold war, the conflict was zero-sum.
Either you supported political rights that is, liberal democracy or you supported economic rights that is, socialism, human rights violations essay.
The result was that negotiations to convert the universal declaration into a binding treaty were split into two tracks. It would take another 18 years for the United Nations to adopt a political rights treaty and an economic rights treaty. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights finally took effect in As the historian Samuel Moyn has argued in his book The Last Utopia, it was not until the late s that human rights became a major force in international relations.
Allies such as Iran and Saudi Arabia were just too important human rights violations essay American security, and seen human rights violations essay a crucial counterweight to Soviet influence. Still, something changed with Carter. It is not that presidents have become more idealistic. Rather, it is that they have increasingly used the language of rights to express their idealistic goals or to conceal their strategic goals, human rights violations essay. Despite the horrifying genocide in Rwanda inand the civil war in Yugoslavia, human rights violations essay, the s were the high-water mark for the idea of human rights.
With the collapse of the Soviet Union, economic and social rights lost their stigmatising association with communism and entered the constitutional law of many western countries, with the result that all major issues of public policy came to be seen as shaped by human rights.
Human rights violations essay rights played an increasingly important role in the European Union and members insisted that countries hoping to join the EU to obtain economic benefits should be required to respect human rights as well. NGOs devoted to advancing human rights also grew during this period, and many countries that emerged from under the Soviet yoke adopted western constitutional systems.
Even Russia itself made halting movements in that direction. The United States was a traditional leader in human rights and one of the few countries that has used its power to advance human rights in other nations. Moreover, the prohibition on torture is at the core of the human rights regime; if that right is less than absolute, then surely the other rights are as well. The rise of China has also undermined the power of human rights. In recent years, China has worked assiduously behind the scenes to weaken international human rights institutions and publicly rejected international criticism of the political repression of its citizens.
It has offered diplomatic and economic support to human rights violators, such as Sudan, that western countries have tried to isolate. Along with Russia, it has used its veto in the UN security council to limit western efforts to advance human rights through economic pressure and military intervention.
And it has joined with numerous other countries — major emerging powers such as Vietnam, and Islamic countries that fear western secularisation — to deny many of the core values that human rights are supposed to protect. Each of the six major human rights treaties has been ratified by more than countries, yet many of them remain hostile to human rights.
This raises the nagging question of how much human rights human rights violations essay has actually influenced the behaviour of governments. There are undoubtedly examples where countries enter into human rights treaties and change their behaviour. The political scientist Beth Simmonsfor instance, has described the observable impact in Japan and Colombia of the ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, human rights violations essay.
The puzzle is how to reconcile this with the many examples of blatant human rights violations. Saudi Arabia ratified the treaty banning discrimination against women inand yet by law subordinates women to men in all areas of life. Child labour exists in countries that have ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child: Uzbekistan, Tanzania and India, for example. Powerful western countries, including the US, do business with grave human rights abusers, human rights violations essay.
In a very rough sense, the world is a freer place than it was 50 years ago, but is it freer because of the human rights treaties or because human rights violations essay other events, such as economic growth or the collapse of communism?
The central problem with human rights law is that it is hopelessly ambiguous. The ambiguity, which allows governments to rationalise almost anything they do, is not a result of sloppy draftsmanship but of the deliberate choice to overload the treaties with hundreds of poorly defined obligations. In most countries people formally have as many as international human rights — rights to work and leisure, to freedom of expression and religious worship, to nondiscrimination, to privacy, to pretty much anything you might think is worth protecting.
The sheer quantity and variety of rights, which protect virtually all human interests, can provide no guidance to governments. Given that all governments have limited budgets, protecting one human right might prevent a government from protecting another. Take the right not to be tortured, human rights violations essay, for example.
In most countries torture is not a matter of official policy. As in Brazil, local police often use torture because they believe that it is an effective way to maintain order or to solve crimes. If the national government decided to wipe out torture, it would need to create honest, well-paid investigatory units to monitor the police. The government would also need to fire its police forces and increase the salaries of the replacements.
It would probably need to overhaul the judiciary as well, possibly the entire political system. Such a government might reasonably argue that it should use its limited resources in a way more likely to help people — building schools and medical clinics, for example. If this argument is reasonable, then it is a problem for human rights law, which does not recognise any such excuse for failing to prevent torture. Or consider, as another example, the right to freedom of expression. From a global perspective, the right to freedom of expression is hotly contested.
The US takes this right particularly seriously, though it makes numerous exceptions for fraud, defamation, and obscenity. In Europe, most governments believe that the right to freedom of expression does not extend to hate speech. In many Islamic countries, any kind of defamation of Islam is not protected by freedom of speech. Human rights law blandly acknowledges that the right to freedom of expression may be limited by considerations of public order and morals.
But a government trying to comply with the international human right to freedom of expression is given no specific guidance whatsoever. Thus, the existence of a huge number of vaguely defined rights ends up giving governments enormous discretion. If a government advances one group of rights, while neglecting others, how does one tell whether it complies with the treaties the best it can or cynically evades them?
The reason these kinds of problems arise on the international but not on the national level is that within countries, the task of interpreting and defining vaguely worded rights, and making trade-offs between different rights, human rights violations essay, is delegated to trusted institutions.
Human Rights Violation Essay / Speech in English by Prateek Sir BEST English classes
, time: 10:37HRDAG – Human Rights Data Analysis Group
May 10, · How are human rights represented in the philosophy of Enlightenment? Analyze human rights violations in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Original Human Rights Topics for Essays. How is the issue of human rights developed in the movie “Hidden Figures”? Define the term “ombudsman.” What role does it play in the issue of human rights? The Human Rights Committee found violations of Article 17 (arbitrary interference with privacy) and Article 7 (cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment) of the ICCPR, reasoning that the applicant suffered mental distress. It noted the applicant’s particularly vulnerable position as a minor and the failure of the State to provide adequate medical Dec 05, · The puzzle is how to reconcile this with the many examples of blatant human rights violations. Saudi Arabia ratified the treaty banning discrimination against women in , and yet by law
No comments:
Post a Comment